|
From: | John Mandereau |
Subject: | Re: an LM update |
Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:52:20 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Graham Percival a écrit :
Ick. Do we really need to ask casual contributors to spend 30 minutes reading how to use git?
I think so, see below.
Isn't there any faster way to give the instructions? Like - copy the conflicted file to a backup name - delete the file - do "git reset --hard" - do "git pull origin" - compare the conflicted file and the new version, and make whatever changes to the new version that you want. ?
Certainly. If you want to perform the merge but are sure to prefer the revision of some CONFLICTING_FILE from origin/BRANCH, you can resolve this with
git checkout origin/BRANCH CONFLICTING_FILE before committing everything to finalize the merge.However, you should not do this without making sure you didn't make any valuable local changes not merged upstream, so I still recommand spending the required bloody 30 minutes or so.
John
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |