[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR, updates and committishes
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: LSR, updates and committishes |
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2009 19:38:10 +0200 |
2009/5/22 John Mandereau <address@hidden>:
> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>> committishes themselves are not checked
>
> They can now, but I was puzzled by the truckload of bad committishes I found
> in Spnaish texidocs,
They were all the same, and no one existed before that.
>so I applied my auto-committish-setting hack to them
> too. I'm not very sure on the correctness of the committishes I changes this
> way, so I advice to randomly check two or three of them.
By default I couldn't guess which one to put, so I put the comm. of a
merge node in our branch. How can they be so wrong?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
- LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/18
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Till Rettig, 2009/05/21
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Till Rettig, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Till Rettig, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, John Mandereau, 2009/05/22
- Re: LSR, updates and committishes, Francisco Vila, 2009/05/25