lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: page breaking changed in 2.13 ???


From: ArnoWaschk
Subject: Re: page breaking changed in 2.13 ???
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:53:00 -0700 (PDT)



Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> 
>> i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
>> observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
>> that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
>> Which leads me in one case of a before 47page piano reduction score
>> (1 to 4 staves per page, staff lines number irregular) becoming a
>> 123page score only having one line per page, even if just being a
>> piano solo line...
> 
> This looks like a bug.  Can you reduce it so that Joe can check it?
> 
> Thank you for your reply!
> No, i do not have a clue how to reduce a huge score, which seems to fail
> because of a certain hugeness...
> I only see that shorter scores get less extreme results...
> And anyway i am far too short of time for experiments. Which is why i am
> *most urgently* seeking for a way back!
> Going to 2.12 would be quite a step back in quality...
> 
>> P. S. I would also be grateful for instructions to roll back my
>> source tree to the April version, if that is the easiest...
> 
> Just use `gitk' to select a certain revision (or tag) `foo'.  Then
> say, on the command line,
> 
>   git checkout foo
> 
> Yes, but how to translate 10th of April 2009 into foo? I cannot see a tag
> in that period...?
> 
> 
> and compile this.  Later, you might revert to the top of git with
> 
>   git checkout master
> 
> 
>       Werner
> 
> thanks again, Arno
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaking-changed-in-2.13-----tp23696365p23696831.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]