Re: page breaking changed in 2.13 ???

[ArnoWaschk]

Arno Waschk wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> i am using a 2.13 lilypond compiled from today's git repo, and i am
>>> observing - in comparison to a version from around 10th of April -
>>> that the page breaking strategy seems to have changed significantly.
>>> Which leads me in one case of a before 47page piano reduction score
>>> (1 to 4 staves per page, staff lines number irregular) becoming a
>>> 123page score only having one line per page, even if just being a
>>> piano solo line...
>> 
>>>>This looks like a bug.  Can you reduce it so that Joe can check it?
>> 
>> Thank you for your reply!
>> No, i do not have a clue how to reduce a huge score, which seems to fail
>> because of a certain hugeness...
>> I only see that shorter scores get less extreme results...
>> And anyway i am far too short of time for experiments. Which is why i am
>> *most urgently* seeking for a way back!
>> Going to 2.12 would be quite a step back in quality...
>> 
>>> P. S. I would also be grateful for instructions to roll back my
>>> source tree to the April version, if that is the easiest...
>> 
>>>>Just use `gitk' to select a certain revision (or tag) `foo'.  Then
>>>>say, on the command line,
>> 
>>>>  git checkout foo
>> 
>> Yes, but how to translate 10th of April 2009 into foo? I cannot see a tag
>> in that period...?
>> 
>> 
>>>>and compile this.  Later, you might revert to the top of git with
>> 
>>>>  git checkout master
>> 
>> 
>>>>      Werner
>> 
>> thanks again, Arno
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/page-breaking-changed-in-2.13-----tp23696365p23696908.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.