[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing dependencies
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: Licensing dependencies |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:01:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:46:32PM +0200, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> and potentially Pango (if it
> upgrades to LGPLv3+).
What does this mean? I mean, *any* project would be a problem if
they changed to a non-GPLv2-compatible license. Are they
considering/planning such a change?
Cheers,
- Graham