[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing dependencies
|
From: |
Joseph Wakeling |
|
Subject: |
Re: Licensing dependencies |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:41:55 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> What does this mean? I mean, *any* project would be a problem if
> they changed to a non-GPLv2-compatible license. Are they
> considering/planning such a change?
Not that I know of. The point is just that most Lilypond dependencies
are either called rather than linked to, or have permissive licenses --
(L)GPL'd dependencies like Pango have greater potential for a version
upgrade that buggers GPLv2-only code.