[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished
|
From: |
Andrew Hawryluk |
|
Subject: |
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:08:46 -0600 |
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
> (and the actual manual pages, of course)
Is it worth mentioning in the essay page that the detailed
typographical examples are easier to analyze in the PDF version than
the HTML version?
-AH
- Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, (continued)
- Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/27
- Re: lilypond programming manual, Graham Percival, 2009/09/28
- Re: lilypond programming manual, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/28
- Re: lilypond programming manual, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/28
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, John Mandereau, 2009/09/27
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished,
Andrew Hawryluk <=