[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished |
|
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:18:56 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:08:46PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
> > http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
> > (and the actual manual pages, of course)
>
> Is it worth mentioning in the essay page that the detailed
> typographical examples are easier to analyze in the PDF version than
> the HTML version?
Sure; done.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, (continued)
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, John Mandereau, 2009/09/27
Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/09/28
- Re: doc reorg (especially Usage) possibly finished,
Graham Percival <=