[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CG addition about Git pulling
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: CG addition about Git pulling |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:53:10 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 03:15:10PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 23:02 +0000, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> > Why not qualify each of these generic words? Like
> > Graham did with "Summary of contributing"?
>
> I second this for node names; as for section titles, they needn't be
> unique, so we could use the same title 'Introduction' for each of these
> sections.
Since there's basic agreement on merging the sections at least,
I've pushed a modified patch (the original had a merge conflict,
so I rewrote it).
I'm open to further renamings.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, (continued)
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/05
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/06
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Graham Percival, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/09
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/08
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling, John Mandereau, 2010/01/10
- Re: CG addition about Git pulling,
Graham Percival <=