[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order" |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2010 09:37:28 -0700 (PDT) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> If somebody wants to work on making unfinished doc
> sections match our doc policy (such as NR 2.1 Vocals, or
> anything in NR 3 or higher), let's talk.
I will be posting a patch soon to reformat the ly code in
the NR, along the same lines as this patch that did the same
thing for the LM:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=0a8cfef
I don't think this is exactly what you're referring to,
since I'm not touching any texinfo node names etc., but I
might as well mention this to prevent anyone from
duplicating a lot of work.
- Mark
- broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/20
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/20
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order",
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/23
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/26
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/29