[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order" |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2010 00:00:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:54:38AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > It must be exactly the same as the @node name, which
> > cannot have things like @code in it.
>
> Yes and no. It must have exactly the same as the @node
> name, but there seems to be no restriction on the use of
> fixed-width commands like @code.
> @node Setting @code{X-offset} and @code{Y-offset} directly
!!!
wow, I didn't think this was allowed.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", (continued)
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order",
Graham Percival <=
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/26
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/29
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/31