Re: [PATCH]: Fix issue 1096

[Carl Sorensen]

On 5/27/10 2:58 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen <at> byu.edu> writes:
>> I saw the comment from David not as a suggestion to build an automated
>> process for feeding the erroneous strings, but as a one-time testing
>> suggestion.  Hence my request for help.
> 
> I'm not sure what the purpose would be for an error test in this case, since
> the
> patch is about preventing an error.

That's what I thought as well, but I think that David was feeling that there
was some need for more extensive testing to make sure that errors were
properly handled instead of segfaulting.

Thanks,

Carl