Re: [PATCH]: Doc: LM 3.2: Entering voices in the correct order.

[Trevor Daniels]

Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, September 19, 2010 7:51 AM


> Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > Well, the Notation Reference is supposed to contain all
> > the information necessary to understand all the notation.
> >
> > If the information on voices isn't in the Notation
> > Reference, then we'll need to have links from the NR to
> > the LM for fundamental operation of commands.
> >
> > We don't want to have duplication.  Although I didn't
> > mention it this way before, I think that we need this
> > information in the NR.
>
> Hmm.  Now I'm inclined to agree with Carl.  Here's a new
> patch.  What do you guys think of the new placement.  Do you
> think the text flows well in this order, etc.?

I'm not particularly opposed to placing this in the
NR, but it's not clear what you are suggesting here.
Do you mean to leave the LM unchanged, or do you intend
to remove or change the corresponding section there?

Also, if it is to go in the NR it needs a separate
section heading.  At the moment it appears under
"The double backslash construct", whereas it applies
equally to explicitly instantiated voices.  Maybe
something like "Voice order"?

Trevor