Re: release plans

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:29:42PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote in message
> news:address@hidden
> >NB: I expect approximately 5 more regressions to be reported in
> >the next week.  Some of them might not be regressions in code that
> >worked deliberately.  Bug Squad (if you read -devel): add any
> >regression as a Critical issue; if a programmer points out that it
> >only worked by a fluke in the past and downgrades it to Medium,
> >that's totally fine.  That's how the system is supposed to work. :)
> 
> I've had a look over the regtest results, and AFAICS there are no
> regressions picked up by the regtests.  Just a planned change with
> multimeasure rests colliding with a clef.

Yes, but as more users start testing 2.13, particularly with their
old scores, I expect that they'll be reporting bugs.

Cheers,
- Graham