RE: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements (issue3989049)

[James Lowe]

Hello,

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Graham Percival
Sent: 01 February 2011 19:21
To: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; 
address@hidden
Subject: Re: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements 
(issue3989049)

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:17:46AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
>> Just some minor syntax changes to make it read better. I hope no one 
>> is offended.

>Not offended, but unfortunately I already pushed it.  Could you make these 
>changes to git?


No problem, I'll do that.


>I don't want to slow down code development by asking non-English speakers to 
>revise text a lot.  As long as the doc team can understand it, I think it's 
>best >for programmers to be programming.

Absolutely, as long as no one feels belittled by these types of corrections 
suggested. I can easily go back afterwards and tidy up.


>> Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:500:
>> General: There is an inconsistency using 'notehead' vs 'note head', so 
>> we need to pick one and stick with it. There is nothing in the CG 
>> (yet) and so we could make a policy if someone has a strong opinion on this.

>address@hidden:~/src/lilypond/Documentation/contributor$ grep notehead * 
>doc-work.itexi:@emph{Note head} NOT notehead.

>that seems like a pretty clear policy.  I didn't check this in the patch, 
>though.

Yes that is clear. Not sure how I missed that, sorry. I'll make the changes in 
the patch for this accordingly.

James