[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git rebase and gitk
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: git rebase and gitk |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:23:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-25-generic; KDE/4.6.0; i686; ; ) |
Am Sonntag, 27. Februar 2011, um 21:03:35 schrieb Graham Percival:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:20:18AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > It is worth noting that `git rebase' is a very powerful command, since
> > you can potentially rewrite all of git history with it. So, in
> > general, be careful that you're not modifying commits that have
> > already been pushed to savannah.
>
> Yes indeed; I've wrecked my lab git repo (I'm the only one using
> it, though) a few times because of this!
>
> How about:
> git rebase -i origin/master
>
> are there any dangers with that?
Only if you did a "git fetch origin" meanwhile. then it might happen that
there are conflicts when rebasing. That's why a do a "git rebase
origin/master" (non-interactive) first, where I only have to deal with those
conflicts. After that, I don't see any dangers (apart from accidental deletes
of whole conflicts, but that's a general danger of the interactive rebase)
with that.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org