Re: make doc

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are
> errors, like we have done with make website?

Yes.  Ideally we should have no texinfo errors, no .ly errors, etc
etc.

> I realise that to make this happen there will have to be lots of
> work to understand it better,

ETA: 150 hours for the English docs alone.  Another 50-100 hours
for the translations.

> Is it worth raising a tracking issue report?

I wouldn't bother adding an issue to the tracker, but there's
certainly no harm in doing so.

Cheers,
- Graham