|
From: | Colin Campbell |
Subject: | Re: bug reports: `verified' hides `invalid' |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jul 2011 06:59:22 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 11-07-14 06:06 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Similarly, I don't like tagging duplicate reports with Verified, either...This deserves a `duplicate-verified' tag... In both cases, it's not trivial to decide whether a bug report is invalid or a duplicate, so verification is useful. Or perhaps better: What about using a completely different field for verifying? Werner _______________________________________________
I'm making notes of this thread, as it connects to the GOP-PROP I'm putting together regarding patch handling.
Cheers, Colin -- The human race has one really effective weapon, and that is laughter. -- Mark Twain
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |