[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget to document a
|
From: |
mtsolo |
|
Subject: |
Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget to document a property. (issue4801045) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:43:06 +0000 |
On 2011/07/25 11:18:28, James.Lowe_datacore.com wrote:
Hello,
)-----Original Message-----
)From: mailto:address@hidden
)[mailto:address@hidden On
)Behalf Of mailto:address@hidden
)Sent: 24 July 2011 09:41
)To: address@hidden; address@hidden;
)address@hidden; address@hidden; lilypond-
)address@hidden; mailto:address@hidden
)Subject: Re: Produces better error messages when programmers forget
)to document a property. (issue4801045)
)
)On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:05 AM, mailto:address@hidden wrote:
)
)> Can you give me an idea what his does and how to test this or what
I
)> am going to see as someone who runs a lot of make/reg tests?
)>
)
)Try adding an undocumented property to an interface (i.e. add "foo"
to
)the Stem interface) and then run make. Before, make would throw an
)error about procedure-name when building internals.texi. Now, it
will still
)throw that error, but before that, it'll explicitly mention that
"foo" is
)undocumented, allowing for one to then document it.
)
)Cheers,
)MS
Thanks, for this information. I'll try to run the test tonight - I ran
out of
time yesterday - so I can see what it looks like when it does what it
is
supposed to do, using Neil's 'broken' patch.
James
Pushed as 922d59a242646c2488738d77263580427bd7764b.
Cheers,
MS
http://codereview.appspot.com/4801045/