[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:18:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 07:05:04AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote:
> The remaining case is where there are no comments when a countdown
> expires. I've been taking that as silence implying consent, but
> with no assurance that anyone has actually reviewed the patch.
Yes, that's correct. Think of the question in marriage
ceremonies: "if anybody knows of a reason why these two should not
be wed, speak now or forever hold your peace.".
Despite what one reads[1] in trashy romance novels, that question
is mostly ceremonial -- nobody actually expects an objection.
That's supposed to happen when you're still dating. So think of
Patch-review as dating, and Patch-countdown as a marriage
ceremony. :)
(but don't delay the countdown just because they've only been
dating for a few hours; if there's space left on the countdown,
might as well go for it. I guess the analogy kind-of breaks down
here)
[1] *cough* I mean, theoretically. Based on what I've heard. I'm
not an expert on the subject.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Colin Campbell, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Carl Sorensen, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Graham Percival, 2011/09/21
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, address@hidden, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
- Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/09/22
Re: GOP-PROP 13: patch management tools, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/20