[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: \hideNote
From: |
Peekay Ex |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: \hideNote |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:17:59 +0000 |
Adam,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Adam Spiers
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
>>> two 'similar' functions
>>>
>>> \hideNote
>>> \hideNotes
>>>
>>> Is a good idea.
>>
>> I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn
>> and \sustainOff).
>> So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then \hideNote
>> could stand for "\once \hideNotesOn".
>> That seems clear to me.
>
> Ah, that makes sense. I could do the rename, but is there some process
> for handling non-backwards-compatible changes in syntax?
>
Don't want to sound like a bore but all this (and other things you
will probably run into) is pretty well documented in our Contributor;s
Guide.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/adding-or-modifying-features
James
--
--
James
- RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Graham Percival, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/02