[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: \hideNote
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: \hideNote |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:11:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
>> two 'similar' functions
>>
>> \hideNote
>> \hideNotes
>>
>> Is a good idea.
>
> I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g.,
> \sustainOn and \sustainOff).
> So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then
> \hideNote could stand for "\once \hideNotesOn".
> That seems clear to me.
Perhaps we should just define a music function
\Once
that takes a music expression and walks through it, adding the necessary
flag to all property operations.
Or we just define \once as a music function doing that and remove it
from the parser altogether. Should be slightly less efficient and quite
more convenient.
--
David Kastrup
- RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Peekay Ex, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Peekay Ex, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, address@hidden, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Graham Percival, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/01
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Graham Percival, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/11/02
- Re: RFC: \hideNote, David Kastrup, 2011/11/02
Re: RFC: \hideNote, Adam Spiers, 2011/11/01