[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update? |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:49:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:50:33PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> obviously I have been too
>> clever about this change done automatically and half-reverted. I did
>> not commit the convert-ly rule since it was somewhat fishy IIRC and
>> while it worked, I checked the results manually.
>>
>> I probably should see how I can get those changes back in a way that
>> sticks. Probably they need to move through Documentation/snippets/new
>> for that. I really don't have all too much of a clue here.
>
> You have two options:
> 1) include a convert-ly script that does this automatically,
> or
> 2) make the changes manually, then put those updated files in
> Documentation/snippets/new
>
> Whichever way you choose, I would like to see a local makelsr.py
> update after that, and the whole thing go through staging into
> master, before anybody looks at doing a general LSR update.
Option 2) is in staging (without removing the previously updated
snippets though). I am still fuzzy about where the translations are
supposed to come back from when they have been removed in snippets/new.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, (continued)
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Neil Puttock, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/01