Re: Rietveld patchy: test run

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Julien Rioux" <address@hidden>; "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; 
"LilyPond Developers" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Rietveld patchy: test run


> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:36:31PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival"
> > <address@hidden>
> >
> > >It's
> > >challenging to decide when I should nag people (or "clarify the
> > >situation") or not.
> >
> > I thought you always erred on the side of nagging people :-)
>
> Believe it or not, I only send approximately 30% of potential
> nags.
>
> - Graham

I'm even more worried now - that you must have a list of "potential nags" 
and then tick them off and can thus run the stats.  :-) again.

--
Phil Holmes