Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

[address@hidden]

On Apr 17, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:

> Ok,
> 
> Could we sum up the discussion?
> As I understand: for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
>    {
>    }
> 
> is ok, right? I will wait for two OKs and then make changes and produce and 
> upload a patch.
> 
> Łukasz
> 

LGTM.
Before you tackle this, I'd strongly recommend asking Han Wen why the flip (&d) 
business is there in the first place - it could be that he opted for the `do' 
loop over a macro for a precise reason that could prove to be important.

Cheers,
MS