[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:16:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Łukasz Czerwiński <address@hidden> writes:
> On 15 April 2012 16:49, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Łukasz Czerwiński <address@hidden> writes:
> > I'd like to write code, that will make Lilypond better or easier
> to be
> > used
>
>
> Not necessarily the same as "the C++ way".
>
>
> Right :) No iterators needed here :)
Actually, with option -std=c++0x GCC would accept
for (Direction d : { UP, DOWN })
{
...
}
and that would be readable enough without having to revert to macros.
--
David Kastrup
- for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/17
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, address@hidden, 2012/04/20
- Message not available
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/04/22
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/23
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15