[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:25:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:10:50PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> I've uploaded my patch without for_UP_and_DOWN, but now it's time to talk
> about this #define. I'd like to make a second patch that will introduce
> that, but there was no consensus.
ok, great!
> If you don't know, what I am talking about, take a quick look at:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5975054/diff/1/flower/include/direction.hh
> (lines
> 75-90).
tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
{ ... }
for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
{ ... }
- Graham
- for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15