Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:37:14PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> > I like that solution, but I'm iffy about relying on compiler
> > support for elements of languages that are less than 10 years old.
> 
> I was not suggesting we use it.  I just pointed out that in future for
> _some_ things "the C++ way" could become less incompatible with
> "readable".

:)

point to you.

- Graham