Re: Plan for discussions

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 13/05/12 23:34, Graham Percival wrote:
> LilyPond itself will remain as a command-line "compiler".  So this
> question can be split into two separate ones:
> - what capabilities should alternate programs (i.e. frescobaldi)
>    have?
> - what should the input syntax be?

When considering these questions, can some attention be given to the 
possibilities of "real-time" update to the score output, as the code is tweaked?

To see what I'm talking about, take a look at the following video, from about 
2:40 onwards:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII

It would be _fantastic_ if LP could give support for an IDE with similar 
easy-tweak, immediate-feedback possibilities.