lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Document <> and improve other simultanous music documentation. (issu


From: Keith OHara
Subject: Re: Document <> and improve other simultanous music documentation. (issue 6248080)
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:02:13 -0700
User-agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (Win32)

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 23:44:30 -0700, <address@hidden> wrote:


http://codereview.appspot.com/6248080/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
File Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6248080/diff/11001/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely#newcode86
Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely:86: duration but can still be
useful for attaching articulations.
On 2012/06/01 22:21:47, Keith wrote:
The text implies that <> is useful for placing articulations where
there are no
notes, such as a delayed turn,
   \relative c'' \new Staff {g2. <>\turn a4}

I don't read that into the text.  How about
"useful in situations where articulations can't be attached to their
target because it is already embedded in a different music construct."



That's better.
I'd say "... but can take articulations and notations,
which will be engraved as if they were attached to a note
starting at the musical moment of the empty chord."




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]