[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320 |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:13:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:01:44PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 13:21, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> >>How about ! then? It actually has both | and . in it, and it _is_ a
> >>sentence ending punctuation.
I missed something; why not keep . for the thick one? as in the
current "|." ?
> "=" cound be used instead of the current "dashed", too.
>
> What about either "[" or "]" for the thick bar line?
>
> "|]" or "|[" compared to "|I" "I|" or "|!" "!|".
>
> I knew we'd come to this point, but besides:
yes, there's many possibilities. And whatever you end up doing,
we're going to change them in a few months in GLISS.
My recommendation: just pick something you like and run with it.
Right now this is in the "sour spot" of bikeshedding. We should
either have a formal discussion (which waits until GLISS), or just
get something done by you picking arbitrarily.
I say that you should pick arbitrarily right now (or in the near
future).
> Are there any objections/meanings about
>
> (1) moving most of the code from bar-line.cc and span-bar.cc into
> the scheme layer
>
> and
>
> (2) is the "single glyph approach" feasible? Changing "." to "I" or
> whatever char
> is not a big problem, once the routines are settled.
Yes, those are much more important things to discuss.
- Graham
- new bar-lines / issue 1320, Thomas Morley, 2012/06/03
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/04
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Marc Hohl, 2012/06/04
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/04
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Marc Hohl, 2012/06/04
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Marc Hohl, 2012/06/04
- Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Janek Warchoł, 2012/06/04
Re: new bar-lines / issue 1320, Marc Hohl, 2012/06/05