Re: preliminary GLISS discussions

[David Kastrup]

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> You can also argue that people that know what a duration is, and how to
>> use it will be better served by writing Scheme directly.  Because a
>> duration is complex enough in Scheme already.
>
> The whole idea of integrating pure Scheme expressions, ie. #(+1 2),
> into LilyPond was to avoid the complexity of having to invent another
> programming language.

Ah, but you did.

do = 1 - 3
\language "italiano" { do = 1 - 3 }

What does this do?

-- 
David Kastrup