Re: preliminary GLISS discussions

[David Kastrup]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Using LilyPond for reading LilyPond files (as opposed to parsers written
>> in Python) has the advantage of being rather thorough, and the
>> disadvantage to be tied into a single version (not all that helpful if
>> you want to write something like convert-ly).
>
> Maybe the time has finally come to drop convert-ly and implement and
> fully supported conversions using LilyPond on music stream level.

You still need a parser of the appropriate version at the front end.

-- 
David Kastrup