lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: preliminary GLISS discussions


From: Benkő Pál
Subject: Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:24:23 +0200

>> The real question is whether is a need to do things like
>>
>>   ligatures  =  { \[ s1 \] \[ s1 \] }
>>   \new Voice << \melody \ligatures >>
>>
>> you'd have to ask jurgen reuter who wrote basically all the ancient
>> notation support.
>
> It would work to do
>
>     ligatures = { s1\[ s1\]\[ <>\] }
>
> If we say "that's ugly", it's not like the situation would be any
> different with () [] \(\)

I'd do
ligatures = { s2\[ s2\] s2\[ s2\] }

(but I never did such a thing and don't intend to do in the future.
I use ligatures and the "push different things in a common Voice"
idiom extensively, but never together.)

p



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]