[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 00:20:59 +0200 |
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:46 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>> This sound like a Right Thing to do, but i'm not knowledgeable enough
>> to know what the results would actually be. Examples appreciated
>> (hopefully some examples will show in other discussions).
>
> Well, one simple consequence would be that one can't define music
> functions in a document (their definition is interpretation, their use
> is parsing). The use of Scheme would be quite constrained, as reading
> it is parsing, evaluating it interpretation.
Ouch. Sound like something we seriously don't want at all.
Janek
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Benkő Pál, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/03
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Joe Neeman, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/04
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/04