[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] Unifying \chordmode and \notemode
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] Unifying \chordmode and \notemode |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Sep 2012 00:31:43 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:09 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> My personal gut feeling is that probably "/", already used for
> separating a chord base, could possibly be used for introducing chords.
> It is not perfect:
>
> c1/7
>
> can be c followed by 1/7, or it can be a seventh chord on c with the
> duration of a whole note. But c1 already can be pitch c followed by
> number 1 or a whole note c. The difference is that 1/7 is a lexical
> unit of its own. But this probably could be made to work.
unless we want to support rational durations written this way.
No, i don't like the idea of using '/' that much.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:18 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>> What about differentiating between notes and chords by case?
>> a -> note
>> A -> chord
>
> Would you use Bes or BES?
Rather Bes.
> If the former, how would you write the equivalent of bes:dim ?
You mean, what case should "dim" be written in? I'd say that it could
be lowercase:
Bes:dim
I.e., the difference between note and chord will be only in the case
of the first letter.
Or did i misunderstood you?
Janek