[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:28:31 +0200 |
2012/9/13 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> IIRC, the old style in lilypond was:
> (c c)
Students whish this came back, I think. No matter how many times I
insist on it, they always ^H^H^H^H usually fail to remember the
correct form c( c)
I find funny that the solution they figured out to remember it, is the
following: "OK, it is not (c c) but c( c), so the opening bracket is
misplaced a step right, which leads to
c (c)
"
Which is somewhat correct anyway. :-) So this way we are back at stage
one and everyone is happy.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/09/11
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Graham Percival, 2012/09/12
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/12
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, Mathieu Huiban, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands, David Kastrup, 2012/09/13