Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:04:01PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Basically every construct that we would be tempted to use <> or s1*0 for
> occasionally is one that is not really attached to a note, but rather to
> a moment in time.

I certainly agree that it would be good to be clear about "stuff"
which is attached to a note vs. "stuff" which is attached to a
moment in time.  (either "the moment between notes" or "some
moment within the previous / next note)

> One argument might be that
> c( c)
> might look ugly, but less ugly than
> (c )c
> looks.  Of course, neither is symmetric.

IIRC, the old style in lilypond was:
  (c c)

- Graham