Re: [GLISS] differentiating pre/post/neutral commands

[Mathieu Huiban]

Dear developers,

Thank you for your work on lilypond.

What about considering ( as a post-event and ) as a standalone event ?
     c( )d( )e  is symmetric and very clear.

best regards,

Mathieu

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and
> post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day
> sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback.  It would make
> (c (d) e)
> visually confusing.  While neither the current
> c( d)( e)
> nor the standalone event version
> (c )(d )e
> will win a price for prettiness, they both beat (c (d) e) in conveying
> meaning rather than looking pleasing.
>
> --
> David Kastrup