Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

[Marc Hohl]

Am 20.09.2012 20:08, schrieb address@hidden:
> We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation
> manual.  Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the
> \override, then we include those snippets in the docs.  This allows us
> to improve the documentation with minimal effort on the part of
> developers.
>
> If there's a special reason to include \override directly, then we can
> -- we do this when discussing automatic beaming, for example, because
> there's no sense in mentioning this without having overrides.  But I'm
> not certain if this applies in this case?
So this means that the first, second and third example should go into a
LSR snippet to be included in the documentation, the latter examples
do not have any \override and can stay unchanged?

At least this would make sense for me.

Regards,

Marc
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel