Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

[benko . pal]

http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely
File Documentation/notation/expressive.itely (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/expressive.itely#newcode1059
Documentation/notation/expressive.itely:1059:
@lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=2]
On 2012/09/25 21:07:06, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> This example shows a beam extending from a stem to the
> final note of the glissando.  Is this correct, or would
> it be better to suppress the beam?

just like ordinary duration display: either a beam or a flag.  Bartók's
String Quartet no. 4. has examples for both.
I find your example fine.  is it mentioned that glissando is not
standardised?  e.g. Bartók wanted all glissandi start immediately, while
others use the headless stem notation, reserving full headed notes to
mean fixed pitch through the whole duration.

http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/