[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:39:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>>>
>>> +----+ +----+----+
>>> +----+ +----+ -+
>>> | | | | |
>>>
>>
>> First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work
>> properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams
>> currently nest in that manner.
>
> OK, ok :-) I'm just doing some brainstorming. I'm quite sure that
> subbeaming with more than a single `[' has already been discussed a
> longer time ago, but I can't remember the outcome.
I consider it likely that the partcombiner vetoed this change, judging
from the tantrums it threw on the various iterations of the related slur
problem <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2584>.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
- Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Feature request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24