[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:33:16 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>>
>> +----+ +----+----+
>> +----+ +----+ -+
>> | | | | |
>>
>
> First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work
> properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams
> currently nest in that manner.
OK, ok :-) I'm just doing some brainstorming. I'm quite sure that
subbeaming with more than a single `[' has already been discussed a
longer time ago, but I can't remember the outcome.
Werner
- Re: Feature request, (continued)
- Re: Feature request, Mats Bengtsson, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, David Kastrup, 2012/09/24
- Re: Feature request, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/09/24
Re: Feature request, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/24