[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:02:07 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Horizontally, i would align the center of the bounding box to the "dip
>> point". This would allow "visual centering" of the glyph on something.
>
> Can do. This would imply that there's empty space on the left of the glyph.
> Is it OK to do this?
No, i mean something else. Take a look at the attachment - this is
how this glyph's bounding box should look like in my opinion.
You may want to take a look at bounding boxes "Arrowed Natural (arrow
up)", "flat (slashed)", "Thumb" (i can see the bounding boxes when i
convert the gf file to dvi and view it using xdvi. (i can send you a
script doing this, if you want)).
>> Vertically, i agree with Werner that the bounding box shouldn't be
>> bigger than the glyph - the distance between staff and the mark should
>> be achieved in some other way.
>
> How would I move it up without adding empty space to the bottom of the box?
I suppose that the command that would change BreathingSign's stencil
to this glyph would also change its padding.
>> I would also place the vertical "center"
>> of the box level with "top dip point", ie the point labeled 2r in dvi
>> preview i see on my machine.
>
> I don't understand this. I know where 2r is, but how can in be in the
> centre - it's way below the centre of the glyph.
See above, i hope my explanation and example is clear.
>> Also, do you have some snippet demonstrating this glyph along with some
>> notes? If so, please post it in the tracker.
>
> Done.
thanks.
Janek
tick bounding box.png
Description: PNG image
- Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/26
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), dak, 2012/09/26
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/26
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), lemzwerg, 2012/09/27
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), PhilEHolmes, 2012/09/27
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), janek . lilypond, 2012/09/27
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/27
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055),
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/28
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/28
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/28
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), James, 2012/09/28
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/28
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/29
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Phil Holmes, 2012/09/29
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/30
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), James, 2012/09/30
- Re: Adds tick mark to scripts (issue 6568055), Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/30