Re: Uses horizontal skylines in accidental placement (issue 6489086)

[David Kastrup]

Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:

>     There were three patchsets (maybe more). If it looks catastrophic,
>     I trust you - just revert it in staging and send me a short
>     example w/ the regression and I'll work on it.
>
> It looks to me that this patch is way past staging, so i'm not sure if
> it makes sense to revert it.

If it is not released yet, "way past staging" is no problem for reversal
(removing stuff from staging before it has reached master is not done by
revert, but by rewriting staging).

> After all, accidental spacing before your patch was bad in some cases,
> and after your patch is bad in some cases - the difference is just
> which cases are wrong ;) Anyway, i'll make a comparison and post the
> results in a comment to issue 2141.

That sounds sensible.

-- 
David Kastrup