[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clefs and transposition [was: Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuple
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Clefs and transposition [was: Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3] |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:02:01 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 12:08 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>> [....]
>
> All of this (and what follows) seems rather aggressive and blunt on a second
> reading -- wasn't meant to be. Apologies. :-\
No problem, i didn't consider it offensive.
I suppose we have to agree to disagree - you haven't convinced me
(while i'm all for defining standards, i still want them to be notated
explicitely), and i probably won't convince you.
cheers,
Janek :)
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, (continued)
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/08
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/08
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/09
- Clefs and transposition [was: Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/09
- Re: Clefs and transposition [was: Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/09
- Re: Clefs and transposition [was: Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3],
Janek Warchoł <=
Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/07