Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

[Keith OHara]

David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> "Trevor Daniels" <t.daniels <at> treda.co.uk> writes:
> 
> > I don't understand.  Are you suggesting we should not document
> > these new functions?  If so, what is the set of commands which
> > should be documented?
> 
> I am not suggesting that.  But there is public consent that documenting
> them would be harmful to our users.  

So we should
Track the bug in \crossStaff and \harmonicByFret
Repair these 2 music functions by using the correct push/pop Scheme functions
Improve the naming of the make-grob-property-*

In general, make more of the Scheme layer documented and accessible 
*after* seeing a cases where it is useful.

I looked for a case in my scores where I wanted a stack, where I wanted to
temporarily override something that I had already overridden, and then put
back my first override.  I did not find any.