[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
RE: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:19:18 +0000 |
Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
>
> I looked for a case in my scores where I wanted a stack, where I wanted to
> temporarily override something that I had already overridden, and then put
> back my first override. I did not find any.
I love having the ability to write a music function that will set desired
properties,
and then put them back to their original state.
For example, suppose I want to write a function that emphasizes the notes in
the music argument by making all the noteheads red. But it should only apply
to the music argument. Then, I want to set things back to what they were when
the function exits. If I use revert, it will set the note heads back to black.
But if I call the function from a voice that has green note heads, it won't
set them back to green; it will always set them back to black.
For a couple of years, I've wanted to have the ability to easily do a push/pop
pair for use in writing music functions.
I'm excited about this option, and fully support it.
Thanks, David!
Carl
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, (continued)
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Trevor Daniels, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Trevor Daniels, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Colin Campbell, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Keith OHara, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- RE: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece,
Carl Sorensen <=