[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.16.1
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 2.16.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:51:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:28 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.16.1
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
>>> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
>>> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 10:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: 2.16.1
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you've done a lot of moving updates into 2.16.1. When do you
>>>>> expect to want a release for this?
>>>>
>>>> I've asked on the translator list whether they want to get something
>>>> translated from all the cherry-picking, and feedback is incomplete yet.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> David Kastrup
>>>
>>>
>>> How are we looking now?
>>
>> git log --oneline --summary origin/stable/2.16..origin/translation
>
> When do you want 2.16.1 built?
Don't panic. I still have no idea for the changes.tely file. Anybody
with experience for that? Just point to Fixed_2_16_1 tags in the
tracker?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: 2.16.1, (continued)
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/23
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/23
Re: 2.16.1, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/24
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/24
- Re: 2.16.1, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/24
- Re: 2.16.1,
David Kastrup <=
Re: 2.16.1, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/10/24