[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:28:27 +0200 |
2012/10/23 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Well, LilyPond could see a problem in connection with issue 2883. Not
> because of a Spanish version of changes.tely but because of outdated
> syntax in the Spanish version, syntax that just was not present in the
> English version, and that did not get converted with convert-ly.
Well, the Spanish version in translation branch matches the English
version in translation branch. Any changes in the original are usually
announced by our 'make check-translation' script. While I was in
translation branch, no change was made to the original, and therefore
no changes were announced. This all comes from the lack of a
translation branch for master/staging forked at the moment stable was
forked. If translators are stuck with stable-translation,
master/staging gets rapidly outdated. I have pushed to staging without
the safety net.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- Re: 2.16.1, (continued)
- Re: 2.16.1, Federico Bruni, 2012/10/21
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/22
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/22
- Message not available
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: [PossibleSpam] Re: 2.16.1, David Kastrup, 2012/10/23
Re: 2.16.1, Phil Holmes, 2012/10/24
Re: 2.16.1, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/10/24